About 11 years ago, Jakob Nielsen wrote an “Alertbox” titled How little do users read?. His research suggests that users will read only 18% of your content. Given that I spend a few minutes editing each sentence I write, that’s pretty deflating.
Since I reread this article, I’ve been more sensitive to my own reading habits on the web. And I’m just another statistic. I find that I read the first couple of paragraphs before I get distracted and scroll down for a call to action.
Then I thought, what strategies can I apply to increase that number from 18%? How can I get my users to read more?
My solution is to set user expectations upfront with an estimated reading time for my articles. My hope is that I can influence users to interrupt article abandonment with the thought “well I know it’s only going to be 1 more minute to finish reading this thing, so I’ll just finish.”
I developed a PHP snippet that basically divides word count by 200 (average words per minute) to output minutes and use the remainder to calculate seconds. After adding this code, you’ll output something like, “Estimated reading time: 1 minute, 30 seconds”
<?php $postContent = $post->post_content; // WordPress post content $wordCount = str_word_count(strip_tags($mycontent)); $m = (int) floor(wordCount / 200); $s = (int) floor(wordCount % 200 / (200 / 60)); $est = $m . ' minute' . ($m === 1 ? '' : 's') . ', ' . $s . ' second' . ($s === 1 ? '' : 's'); ?> <p>Estimated reading time: <?php echo $est; ?></p>
After using this code on my own site, I was surprised to see my article’s average reading time was around 2 minutes and 30 seconds. So if I can increase my time on site to around that time, I’m doing pretty well. You might want to check your own analytics and compare against your article’s reading time s against time on site.
But if you do, beware of outliers—in this case people who leave your website open & bounces—that skew your time on site metric because most analytics calculate mean, not median.
After testing my estimated time theory on nearly 3,000 visits, I have some results. Showing an estimated time improved time on site by 13.8%. What’s more interesting though — people either followed me, subscribed to my blog, or retweeted my articles 66.7% more often.